Anyhow, so forever is a very longtime, and the thought I run with is that change is time, so with unlimited time, things like out loyalty and affection can be molded into anything necessary. So, what is necessary? The covenant path. Obviously. At a youth conference, I didn't get "sealed" to anyone cause I didn't want to. Um, there is a Christian teaching about submitting your will to the father even if it isn't what you want. At the Youth Conference. I followed that notion and picked a random guy, who happened to be Penny Craven's boyfriend and got him to "Marry" me explaining the necessity of it. He agreed. But, then later after we were in the Celestial Kingdom, we went to go have a testimony meeting and my "husband" left me to go sit with his girlfriend. So, that suggests it is better to be loved than to love, or does it? If I had been in love and wanted to be with someone, I certainly would have behaved differently, whereas my argument had been that it was a formality. And frankly, that is how I feel about it right now. I definitely lack wisdom!! Without disclosing details, I had prayed in the past asking a question that was answered undeniably, svo eg veit hann er þar, og.... sorry, was singing a song in Icelandic and I also know that He will hear and answer me.
My additional thought is more a memory of a thing I had been taught that is applicable. I lived for a while with Sister Reinbold and she used to stress about. She asked me which man she would be with because she had been married three times. I was young and impressionable, so I remember it. Then in a class I was taught that nothing is forced in the Celestial kingdom. You will be with whomever you want to be with who is worthy.
I think I already have all that I need to know, I am being petty in seeking to be compelled, like my husband on Saturday. He claimed his car needed to be repaired, but was doing nothing about it. He just sat at his computer playing games, until I asked him if he was just waiting for it to somehow be fixed.